Custom controlled seating surface technologies

ABSTRACT

A system of controlling various actuators associated with human support surfaces is disclosed. Such a system is made up of a support surface, a controller, and an actuator. The system may optionally include batteries, a means of charging the batteries, and a graphical user interface as well as a communication link between the graphical user interface and the support surfaces. The actuators are capable of altering contour and/or firmness, of a support surface, they may be vibrational or heating/cooling in nature, and they may also alter the overall relative position of a support surface to another support surface, and/or to the ground plane.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/079,528, filedNov. 13, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/648,272,filed Dec. 28, 2009, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,596,716 on Dec. 3,2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No.61/204,045, filed Dec. 31, 2008. These priority applications, includingall attachments, exhibits, and appendices, are incorporated by referencehere in their entirety to provide continuity of disclosure.

The inventor also has filed related applications: U.S. Ser. No.14/704,603; U.S. Ser. No. 14/133,835; U.S. Ser. No. 13/093,676, issuedas U.S. Pat. No. 8,636,320; U.S. Ser. No. 12/082,571, issued as U.S.Pat. No. 7,931,334; U.S. Ser. No. 11/295,789; and U.S. ProvisionalApplication Ser. No. 60/633,956. Each application referred to in thisparagraph, including the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and12/648,272, is incorporated here by reference in its entirety to providecontinuity of disclosure. The entire disclosure of all applications ishereby incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to chairs and seating, as well as otherbody support surfaces, normally associated with but not limited toresidential or commercial office work. These chairs employ a number ofmethods to enhance the user's comfort and promote ergonomically healthysitting. These methods include various forms of padding and flexing ofthe seat and back as well as separate mechanical controls that controlthe overall movements of the seat and back, often referred to as chaircontrols or chair irons.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Various approaches to making a chair's seat and back form fitting forvarious users are known in the industries of seating manufacture. Theseapproaches range from the rather traditional use of contouring syntheticfoam, to seat/back shells that have a degree of flex. There have alsobeen approaches that employ various mechanisms to vary the firmness ofselected areas of a seating structure. Several problems exist with eachof these approaches though.

In the case of simply using foam padding, under normal manufacturingconditions it is difficult if not impossible to properly select contoursthat fit all of the population. And so often a softer variety of foammust be selected so that the occupants can reform to a degree thecontours. And so, either improper contouring must be used or the chairis unsupportive through it being too soft.

In the case of incorporating flex into the shells of a chair, nogeometry to date has achieved the proper amount of flex in the rightareas to give correct ergonomic comfort for a wide range of individuals.In the case of a sling approach, the curves imparted on the sling by theframe are simple in nature (non-compound) and thus cannot provide theproper contouring necessary for ergonomic comfort. Also, this approachleads to “hammocking”. Hammocking is when the sling is pressed in onearea; the areas immediately adjacent have the tendency of foldinginward, squeezing the occupant, again not yielding the proper ergonomiccurvatures. An additional problem with sling chairs is that if themanufacturer makes the supporting sling surface taut enough to properlysupport a large-heavy person, the tension on the sling will be too greatfor a smaller person, resulting in discomfort.

Finally, the present state of the art dictates that the contours adesigner may choose in seating design be generic in nature toaccommodate the widest range of the population possible. In an effort toincrease comfort, manufacturers have produced “sized” (i.e. small,medium and large) chairs that effectively narrow the amount ofcontouring-compromise that the designer must normally exercise.Unfortunately, this leads to the manufacturer having to tool threeindependent products instead of one, and the manufacturers, wholesalers,and retailers having to stock (in this example) three times the quantityof product. Additionally, the end user is stuck with a chair that atsome point in the future may be the wrong size. Moreover, sizing is notan absolute in defining the particular contours that an individual maydesire. This invention addresses these shortcomings with a new and novelapproach to seating adjustment and control.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is top view of a chair employing the invention.

FIG. 2 is a front view of a chair employing the invention.

FIG. 3 is a side elevation of the chair and according to the presentinvention.

FIG. 4 is a plan view of one embodiment of the invention. It shows thatone form of an actuator may take the form of a fluid bladder, which maybe variably shaped and has a nominal thickness when deflated.

FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 7 is a side sectional view of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 8 is a side sectional view of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 9 is a sectional view of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 10 is a sectional view of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 11 is a sectional view of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 12 is a sectional view of one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 13 is a detail side sectional view of an actuator of the inventionin a first position.

FIG. 14 is a detail side sectional view of an actuator of the inventionin one of many and variable second positions.

FIG. 15 is a trimetric view of an actuator, much like that of FIG. 13,of the invention in a first position.

FIG. 16 is a detail a trimetric view of an actuator, much like that ofFIG. 14, of the invention in one of many and variable second positions.

FIG. 17 is a detail a trimetric view of an actuator, much like that ofFIG. 15, of the invention in one of a first position with an associateddissipation/contour member.

FIG. 18 is a detail a trimetric view of an actuator, much like that ofFIG. 16, of the invention in one of many and variable second positionswith an associated dissipation/contour member.

FIG. 19 is a plan view of a proposed interface for controlling theactuator(s).

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS USED IN THE FIGURES

-   -   1. Seat seating surface    -   2. Back seating surface    -   3. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   4. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   5. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   6. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   7. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   8. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   9. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   10. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   11. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   12. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   13. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   14. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   15. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   16. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   17. A proposed adjustment zone/region.    -   18. Fluid bladder.    -   19. Fluid Conduit.    -   20. Seam of 18.    -   21. Foam or outer shell surface.    -   22. Dissipation layer and/or contour form.    -   23. Bladder or actuator level/layer.    -   24. Support shell.    -   25. Mechanical actuator.    -   26. Flexible member.    -   27. Screw actuator.    -   28. Nut of actuator.    -   29. Lever.    -   30. Fixed member relative to the rest of the cushion/seating        surface assembly.    -   31. Actuator or bladder pocket.    -   32. Pivot/flex pivot.    -   33. Worm.    -   34. Worm spur.    -   35. Base plate or bottom of 31 or 24.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

While the invention will be described in connection with a preferredembodiment, it will be understood that I do not intend to limit theinvention to that embodiment. On the contrary, I intend to cover allalternatives, modifications and equivalents within the spirit and scopeof the invention.

It is a handicap to the designer to try to design a chair with theproper contours for the full range of the population. The resultingdesigns and contours are necessarily compromises, and thus are notoptimal for any given individual. In an effort to overcome theselimitations, manufacturers have produced “sized” (i.e. small, medium andlarge) chairs that effectively narrow the amount ofcontouring-compromise that the designer must normally exercise. The factof the matter is that there are several aspects to sizing. The first,and most obvious, is the overall sizing of the surfaces as far as width,height etc. As far as comfort is concerned, this is the least importantaspect of seating surface design. Appropriately sized seating surfacescan be formulated that satisfy the extremes. What is most important inachieving seating comfort is the contouring that occurs within whateversized seating surface is chosen. Unfortunately, this contouring variesgreatly from a small individual, to a large one. Additionally, someindividuals who seemingly share the same body types prefer differingcontours such as stronger/weaker lumbar contours. Although the presentinvention addresses this need for variable contouring through itscustomizable structure, further advantages in comfort can be realized ifthe initial contours of the seating structure are in generally theproper range. Through the present invention's unique method ofconstruction, these goals are all achievable. In addition to seating,various embodiments of this invention may be applicable to other typesof surfaces that support a human such as beds, automotive seating, or aseparate support surface, cushion or pad that is to be used with/placedupon another surface such as a chair or bed etc.

All of the embodiments deal with the placement of actuators in variousareas of a surface to support an individual's body. These actuators maymake the area that they are in firmer. Alternatively, these actuatorsmay re-contour the area that they are in as well as adjacent areas. Andalternatively, such actuators may be vibrational, or heat generating innature. And alternatively yet, these actuators may reposition thesupport surface to better support an individual's body. One example ofthis is movable armrests on a chair. There is an important distinctionbetween firming an area of a seating surface (not letting the occupantsink in as much) as opposed to maintaining a given firmness levelthrough the use of a set thickness of padding etc. and changing thecontours through the actuation of an actuator. As will become apparentin the disclosure, the difference between firming and recontouring isaccomplished by varying the resiliency of the various components thatmake up the system. In its simplest form, when the layer(s) closest tothe user are made to be less resilient than they were previously,firming is accomplished. Alternatively, when the layer(s) resiliencyclosest to the user is maintained, but the shape has changed,recontouring is accomplished. However, when more than one actuator orsystem surface is contemplated, as is often the case in this disclosure,that which was solely a firming scenario, as previously presented, maybe a recontouring scenario given the potential relative positions of allactuators at any one time. So while some embodiments of the inventionare directed at varying firmness, other embodiments are directed at thegoal of varying the contours with the same amount of firmness throughoutthe range of adjustment, and still others contemplate that by varyingthe firmness of some areas relative to others, a variance in contour isachievable. One type of actuator under consideration is anelectro-mechanical actuator. Such an actuator may be designed withmotors, gears, linkages linear motors, piezo-electric motors or nytinolwire etc. Another type of actuator is a bladder/or hydraulic system thatcan be inflated and deflated with a working fluid such as air or wateror that uses a piston arrangement. Another type of actuator is avibrational actuator that can stimulate the user in various zones.Another type of actuator is a heat module that can heat or cool thezones. And so these modules may be used alone or in combination witheach other, within a single zone, or within the entire body-supportingstructure.

Also common to all the disclosed embodiments are various methods forcontrolling the actuators. As such, the proposed technologies may becontrolled through several interfaces. One such interface is a keypadentry system coupled directly to a part of the chair or cushions. Suchan interface may be on a wire tether, or pendant or be located inanother easily accessible area. One example is that an arm-pad may bepivotable to reveal the keypad. Another is that the keypad may slide outfrom under or from within the seat or back cushion, revealing thecontrol interface surface. Optionally, this pendant may be wireless,much like a remote control for various pieces of electronic equipment.This controlling interface may have a dynamic display such as a LiquidCrystal Display/LCD or equivalent display, or static graphics. A dynamicdisplay is defined as one where the graphics are changeable in anelectrical or electronic fashion. A static display is defined as onewhere the graphics are static, or do not change and thus simply act asstationary identifiers for switches. This controlling interface may alsorely upon a microprocessor, digital or analog circuitry to accomplishthe various modes of operations.

In another embodiment the control of the seating surfaces is controlledvia a secondary computer interface. In this sense, the computer could beeither be of what is commonly referred to as a Personal Computer/PC, orbranded personal computer such as an APPLE/MACINTOSH™ running any one ofa variety of operating systems. As such, these terms may be usedinterchangeably. Since many times the seating will be used in front of acomputer, a Graphical User Interface/GUI may be used to control theseating surfaces. In such cases the chair may be tethered to thecontrolling computer by way of a Serial port, Communication/Com port,Line Print Terminal/LPT/Parallel Port, or Universal Serial Bus/USB port,Bluetooth, LAN (local area network (wired or wireless)), or any othercommonly used computer port located on the computer. Such a tether,whether permanent or otherwise may be of the retractable cord-reelvariety relative to the controlling computer or support surface to becontrolled. Additionally, another way of controlling the seatingsurfaces, via the PC computer GUI, is to have a control-transmitter unitwhich plugs into one of the computer ports, and then thatcontrol-transmitter unit communicates wirelessly with acontrol-receiving unit located in/on the seating surfaces. The programthat provides the GUI, under one of the operating systems, may becreated in one of many programming languages such as C, C+, HTML, orJava, as it is cross-platform/operating system compatible.

As the unit needs to be powered, there are several anticipated means forgetting power to the seating surfaces. One is to tether the seatingsurfaces to an electrical source such as a wall outlet. Another is tohave a battery pack located in/on the seating surfaces. The batterycould be of the disposable variety such as lead-acid, alkaline, etc. andwould be replaced when discharged. Also anticipated is that the batterycould be rechargeable. The battery pack could be recharged in one ofseveral modes. One such mode is to temporarily tether the seatingsurfaces/battery to an electrical source such as a wall outlet. Anotheris to remove the pack, to then recharge it using a line-poweredcord/recharging station, and then replace it. So the battery may beremoved as a battery pack (defined as more than one cell combined ineither series or parallel) to be charged via a charger plugged into astandard wall outlet or to a USB connection which typically providespower at 5 volts/500 milliamps. Another method is to not remove thepack, but instead temporarily tether the seating surfaces/battery to anelectrical source such as a USB outlet on a computer, which can supplythe appropriate voltage. A circuit can be provided so that the cells maybe charged in parallel and discharged or used in series. In this way theactuators may use a voltage that is greater than the recharging voltage.A breakaway connector for the USB/other port is also anticipated, sothat in the unfortunate event that the cord is pulled while the chair ischarging/communicating, the force to disconnect is less than that tonormally disconnect the USB connector, thereby reducing or eliminatingdamage to either device such as a laptop and the seating surface.Another anticipated method of charging or powering the invention is byproviding an induction hot-spot relative to a charging coil so that whenthe seating surfaces or a part of the associated chair is in closeproximity to the hot spot the battery is inductively recharged. And yetanother method is to provide charging terminals on some area of thechair so that when the chair is “docked’ with a charging station, thecharging terminals of the chair come into contact with the chargingterminals of the charging station, thus charging the battery.

Several modes of operation of the invention are anticipated. One suchmode is that the user adjusts the various zones to an appropriatecomfort level, and then readjusts the various zones when change isdesired. The various areas of the seating surface may be controlledindividually, or in pairs such as left and right, or in known supersets,sets, and subsets made up of various combinations or sub combination(s)of zones. So for example, a superset may be settings for all zones, anda set may new settings for four zones within a super set, and a subset,may be new/alternate settings for two zones within a subset. So nestedsetting relationships may be created. Of note is that the termssuperset, set, and subset are often used interchangeably throughout thisdisclosure, as under various scenarios, any or all may be applicable.

Another is that several preset “comforts” may be stored. A presentcomfort is a set level of each of the zones relative to each other,which would result in a set of individual zone settings that may beinitiated with a single preset button/program/algorithm. These presetsmay relate to different users, who may use the same chair or seatingsurface at differing times. This is often the case in vehicular seatingor in office seating that must transient several work shifts. A singleuser though often would also desire these presets for a variety ofreasons. Often comfort requirements differ throughout a workday. Alsocommon is that different tasks and different seating heights couldrequire different comfort requirements. These could be invoked throughdifferent presets.

Another mode of operation is where the various zones cycle periodically.This could stimulate blood flow and provide a massaging effect to theuser. Such cycling could be a variant of the user's “ideal” for a zone.For example, a particular zone may change periodically from thepre-selected setting (by the user) to plus 5% (or any other percentage)to minus 5% (or any other percentage).

Another mode of operation is where the zones change in response to theposition of the seating surfaces. It has been found that the contourrequirements of a seating surface often change as the user takesdifferent positions within a chair, such as fully upright versus fullyreclined. In other words, a user needs different contours in areas suchas the lumbar and sacral areas when he/she is fully upright than when heor she is reclined. The invocation of these different posture-settingscan be accomplished through sensors or switches mounted on the seatingsurfaces or chair which, based on the position of the chair (such asreclined), activate the necessary changes of contour based on a presetor an algorithmic variant. Another anticipated mode is where sensorssuch as pressure transducers are employed to detect the user's shiftingof weight, and the necessary contour changes are actuated based on apreset or an algorithmic function. Any of these anticipated modes may beused individually, or in any combination with each other.

The set-up process or procedure can occur in one of several ways. Onesuch way is all at once. In other words, all custom contours for all thezones can be selected at once, and set into memory as a “contour set”,or as the previously mentioned “super set”. The setting into memoryprocedure would occur through the user pressing an appropriate memorybutton on a pendant or remote, or by selecting the appropriate icon fromthe graphical user interface of the computer. Alternatively, anincremental approach may be taken, whereby one or several zone customcontours may be selected as a “set” and then additional zone(s) may beadded or original zones altered to that set at a later time.Additionally, additional sets or sub-sets may be added or altered at anytime and set into memory. Once more than one “contour set” has beencreated the actuators may move from one set to another. This is usefulwhen the user finds that the zones are highly interdependent on oneanother's position. In other words, when zone X is in position 1, zone Yis most comfortable in position 3, but when the same zone X is inposition 2, zone Y is most comfortable in position 4, and so forth ifnecessary for any or all of the remaining zones. Sets may be named orassigned a graphical symbol(s). These names or symbols may relate toindividual users as well as the supersets, sets, and subsets or routinesof those individual users. So user 1 may have his or her sets,supersets, and subsets and user 2 would have theirs. Additionally, user1 may have a set, superset or subsets tailored for a specific task ortime of day. So a user may have a set, superset or subset tailoredspecifically to keyboarding, mousing, reading, writing, reclining, etc.wherein each of these activities has its own program(s). And a user mayalso find that they would desire that sets, superset or subsets betailored to a time-specific regimen. So a user may find that they like agiven supersets, sets, and subsets for morning activities when they arerelatively “fresh”, but mid or late day when they are not so “fresh” andtheir back is tired they would like an alternative set, superset orsubsets.

Alternatively, the user may request a random movement of the individualactuators from one superset/set/subset to another. This can be usefulwhen the user does not find that the some or all of the zones are highlyinterdependent on one another's position, and instead wants thestimulating effect of the overall movement of the seating surfaces.

Even when one complete superset/set or subset is to replace another, ithas been found that in some situations it is advantageous to limit thenumber of actuators that may be running simultaneously. This is when theactuator's power requirements cumulatively may exceed the powerinstantaneously available. So it has been found that employing ahardware level limiting circuit and/or prioritizing-logic circuit or asoftware level prioritizing-logic program is useful.

Several approaches are anticipated for ensuring that the communication,when wireless, does not interfere from one controllerpendant/remote/computer and its associated seating surface, and anothercontroller pendant/remote/computer and its associated seating surface.One such method is to use a communication, which is regional such asradio waves, or infrared, or Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. Another, regardless ofcommunication format is to individually code each individual system.Such coding can occur at the hardware or software level through theselection of individual frequencies. Alternatively, such coding can bedone on a soft level by having the controller or remote and the seatingsurfaces having paired identities. In this way the two components thatare to communicate wireless sly (the controller/computer/or remotependant and support surfaces) can transmit and receive commands eachwith a linked identifier or name, numerical or otherwise, and thus knowthat the communication was intended for their pairing and not anotherset of components in proximity of the first set. One way to accomplishthis is to the use previously mentioned wired or wireless networkingtechnology or Wi-Fi. One such standard in current use is referred to as802.11G. This type of communication/control could have several benefitsover the other previously mentioned types of communication/control. Itis digital in nature, whereas some of the others are analog in format.Thus the digital signal is not as prone to degradation or interferencefrom other radio signals or existing electrical noise. AdditionallyWi-Fi, or similar technology, is inherently Bi directional, allowing thesupport surfaces to communicate information back to thecontroller/controlling program or Graphical User Interface. And also,more control channels at a greater precision and speed would beavailable.

Another anticipated method is for the user to have to manually activateor permit the reception of commands from the wirelesscontroller/computer/remote and the seating support surface. This couldbe as simple as depressing a switch on either of the two components (thecontroller/computer/or remote pendant and support surfaces) enablingthem to transmit or receive for only a specified period of time, numberof commands, or another limiting variable.

Of course, when the controller/computer remote pendant is in wiredcommunication with the support surfaces, this “cross-talk” is not aproblem. This wired orientation may be a less than ideal situation whenthe controlling computer is a desktop, laptop or tower style personalcomputer. However, in this situation the tethering may be onlytemporarily necessary. Commands as previously discussed may beperiodically downloaded to the seating-support surface and the/an onboard controller can exert real time control. In this mode the maincomputer serves as an advanced graphical user interface and a masterprocessing and memory center. Of note is that the invention at hand maybe offered in kit or component form, so that it may be offered to avariety of manufacturers of support surfaces for subsequent integrationinto their own product(s).

Additionally, while much of this disclosure is directed at the supportsurfaces for the user's torso, as previously mentioned, other supportsurfaces are to be included. To that end, arm supports, head-necksupports, foot/leg supports are all to be included as support surfaces.And so the actuators in these zones could act as those alreadydescribed, altering contour, firmness, be vibrational or heating/coolingin nature, or alternatively be position-alterable. For example theheight of a chair's armrests relative to the rest of the chair could bealtered by an actuator(s) as well as be made firmer or softer by adifferent actuator, as well as be contourable by an actuator, and all ofthese may be controlled by the controller/graphical user interface.

Referring to FIG. 1, a seating surface 1 can be seen. Some contemplatedzones 310 for the placement of actuators or bladders can also be seen.Of note are zones 3 and 8 under the ischials, zones 5 and 10 under thefront of the user's thighs, and zones 4 and 9, intermediate of thethighs. These six zones are of particular importance, as the varying oraltering of these zones cannot only affect comfort with regard tocontour, but can also change the user's pelvic tilt or overall attituderelative to the other zones or seating support surfaces, whether they beon the seat or the back. However, this is not to diminish the value ofany of the other zones. Additionally, any of these zones may bepartitioned into sub-zones or linked to form larger zones or zones of adifferent size or shape.

Referring to FIG. 2 a back seating surface 2, can be seen. Somecontemplated zones 11-17, for the placement of actuators or bladders canalso be seen. Zones 16 and to some extent zones 12 and 15, are in thelumbar region of which a great deal of emphasis has been put as of late.This has traditionally been handled as a singular area of adjustmentwithin a chair. By breaking it into multiple zones a greater degree ofvariation, control, and thus comfort can be achieved for a greaterpercentage of the populace. Zones 11 and 14 are disposed at anapproximate position of the user's scapulas. This is an area that isoften difficult to sculpt into a shape that is optimized, with regard tocomfort, for a large demographic. This is because the perceived comfortfit varies throughout the population greatly, and the amount ofadjustment necessary can be equally as great. Zone 17 is in theapproximate sacral area of a user. It should be appreciated that bybeing able to adjust any or all of these zones relative to one another,even from the seat to the back surface, a tremendous number ofcontour-comfort variations are possible.

FIG. 3 is simply a side view of FIGS. 1 and 2 for greater clarity.

Referring to FIG. 4, an example fluid bladder actuator, which can beinflated and deflated with a working fluid such as air or water, can beseen. Such a fluid bladder may be variably shaped and notably may have anominal thickness when deflated. This minimal thickness to maximuminflated thickness as well as inherent dampening and dissipationqualities are much of the appeal of employing such structures. In theembodiments that employ air bladders, sensors may be included in theassembly. These sensors would preferably not only measure the pressurethat the occupant exerts, but instead or additionally, monitor thepressure or inflation of the bladders to sense any leak-down. In theembodiments that employ electro-mechanical actuators, sensors may alsobe included in the assembly. These sensors could provide feedback, notto only measure the pressure that the occupant exerts, but theyalternatively measure the position of the actuator.

Referring to FIG. 5, a schematic representation of one embodiment of theinvention can be seen. As depicted the schematic relates to a bladdersystem; however as can be seen by referring also to FIG. 6, any of theother contemplated actuators may be employed with the appropriatemodifications. Either the P.C. computer interface, or the pendant/chairmounted programmable interface, or both may be employed at any giventime. And in some cases the pendant/chair mounted programmable interfaceare combined into a single unit. At any rate, it can be seen that thehost P.C. computer may be directly tethered to the control module or aspreviously discussed communicate via a transmitter and receiver (dottedline). Although a single bladder/actuator and associated elements areillustrated, the control module may have as many actuators as is deemednecessary linked to it. In the illustrated embodiment, a pump is used toinflate the bladder with a fluid medium such as air and the valve isused to release the fluid. The valve may be positioned in any fluidcommunicating position with regard to the bladder, and thus does notneed to be in line with the pump. Alternatively, when the system is touse a fluid medium other than air, an appropriate holding vessel for thefluid can be provided when the bladder/hydraulic system is to bedeflated. Referring to FIG. 6 a figure much like FIG. 5 can be seen, andthe differences between these two figures has already been described.

Referring to FIG. 7 a partial cross section through a seat back can beseen. An outer shell surface 21 can be seen. This surface may be made offoam which optionally may be covered in fabric, as is common.Alternatively, this surface may be of a deformable membrane likematerial such as fabric or rubber sheeting. And alternatively yet, thissurface may be of a shell like material. An optional intermediate shellor dissipation layer 22 can be seen. This surface may also be made offoam. Alternatively also, this surface may be of a deformable membranelike material such as fabric or rubber sheeting. And alternatively yet,this surface may be of a deformable or non-deformable shell likematerial such as plastic, so that its shape may be resiliently altered,or alternatively, it may alter the shape of outer surface 21. This layer22 may be an overall layer or segmented in nature.

Referring to FIG. 8, a view substantially similar to view 7 can be seen.This view simply shows that the dissipation layer 22 is not alwaysnecessary. This has been found in the cases when the actuator is of thevariety where no dissipation layer is necessary such as a vibrational orheat generating actuator, when the foam or outer surface layer 21, canact as a dissipation layer, or when the actuator itself has featuresthat act in a manner substantially similar to a dissipation layer and/orcontour form.

Referring to FIG. 9, a cross sectional view can be seen. In this view itcan be seen that a motor/screw actuator 27 may pull a flexible member26, via actuator nut 28, thus pushing dissipation layer 22, which may ormay not be resilient, forward, thus either firming or recontouring outersurface 21, depending upon the materials/structure selected and/or thisactuator's position relative to other actuators or elements/surfaceswithin the system.

Referring to FIG. 10, another cross sectional view can be seen. In thisview it can be seen that a motor/screw actuator 27, may pull a lever 29,via actuator nut 28, thus pushing dissipation layer 22, which may or maynot be resilient, forward, thus either firming or recontouring outersurface 21, depending upon the materials/structure selected and/or thisactuator's position relative to other actuators or elements/surfaceswithin the system.

Referring to FIG. 11, another cross sectional view can be seen. In thisview it can be seen that a motor/screw actuator 27, may push or pullflexible bow member 26, via actuator nut 28, thus pushing dissipationlayer 22, which may or may not be resilient, forward, thus eitherfirming or recontouring outer surface 21, depending upon thematerials/structure selected and/or this actuator's position relative toother actuators or other elements/surfaces within the system.

Referring to FIG. 12, an actuator much like that depicted in FIGS. 13-18can be seen. Of note, is the pocket 31 that can be formed into a supportor support shell 24, to accommodate an actuator. Other features of FIG.12 will become apparent after a review of the other pertinent figures.

Referring to FIG. 13, a side view of a potential actuator can be seen.When a mechanical actuator 25, such as a motor, draws on flexible member26, bowing of 26 can be accomplished, as can be seen by referring toFIG. 14. FIG. 14, shows substantially the same mechanism of FIG. 13, inan alternate position. In some cases, appropriate pivots/virtual flexpivots 32, may be appropriately incorporated.

Referring to FIG. 15 a mechanical actuator much like that of FIGS. 13and 14 can be seen, however in FIG. 15, a trimetric view is shown ingreater detail. A mechanical actuator 25 is shown. This mechanicalactuator could be a rotary motor, a linear motor, a piezoelectric motor,nytinol wire based motive force, etc. As shown it is a relatively smallrotary electric motor which drives worm 33. Worm 33 drives spur 34,which in turn is directly coupled to worm 33-b, which is coupled to spur34-b, which is directly coupled to a screw that drives nut 28. In thisway a very compact, highly reductive/highly powerful drive can beaccomplished, that also through the use of worms and/or the screw isself-locking in nature, so that the actuator's holding power electricalrequirements are zero. Obviously, a variety of reduction drive types andarrangements could be employed and are anticipated. Once nut 28 iscaused to translate, flexible member 26 may assume a variety ofpositions. FIG. 16 is essentially the same mechanism of FIG. 15, in analternate position.

FIG. 17 is substantially the same mechanism as FIG. 15, however it isshown that an inherent dissipation layer and/or contour form, (dependingon the relative resiliency of the materials or structures) may beintegrated into the actuator. And FIG. 18 is essentially the samemechanism of FIG. 17, in an alternate position.

Several methods of feed-back from the actuators is anticipated in orderfor the controller to accurately return any given actuator to a desiredposition or state. As previously mentioned, an actual sensor may be usedsuch as a potentiometer, proximity sensor, optical encoder or otherknown feedback/sensor systems. This type of solution is consideredclosed loop in nature as the controller sends out a command, and thesensor is able to communicate that the command was received, andproperly executed. Additionally, depending on the sensors employed otherdata can be communicated back to the controller such as pressure thesupport surfaces relative position with regard to a vertical/horizontalaxis etc.

Other methods of the controller being able to know the position or stateof an actuator that are open loop in nature are also anticipated. Onesuch method is for the controller to send a signal that would cause theactuator to move to an extreme of its travel, or a position that wouldover-travel if a stop were not hit. Now the controller knows a (zero orreference) positional state of the controller and can send out a signalwith a time duration appropriate to move the actuator to the desiredposition/state. Another method of open loop control is to use steppers.This is much like the aforementioned method, except that much greaterprecision is achievable. The zero position is achievable in the wayalready described, or with more rudimentary sensors (than opticalencoders etc.) such as limit switches.

Referring to FIG. 19, a plan view of one type of P.C. based graphicaluser interface (GUI) is depicted. Pictorial depictions of the seat 1,and the back 2, are shown. As shown, the user may simply use a mouse,keyboard or other input device to select positive (+) or negative (−)values for any of the depicted zones. Additionally, by using the variouspull downs, right/left-clicking/keyboarding or other common P.C.inputting methods, the user may select or invoke various presets, createpresets, save presets, time presets, select users etc. or accomplish anyof the before mentioned/described modes of operations. If such a GUIwere pendant, a remote or non P.C. based, the graphical icons andcontrols could be located on a dynamic LCD or equivalent based display.Alternatively, if such a GUI were pendant, a remote or non P.C. based,and static in nature, the graphical icons could have the appropriateswitches associated with them.

It should be noted that it is anticipated that it may be desirable toincorporate a manual over ride for various axis of movement. This couldbe useful in the case of power failure, component failure, or thenecessity for a manual adjustment for speed/safety/egress etc. Oneanticipated inventive method is to incorporate a pivot-nut, springbiased nut, or other variable nut that rides on the drive worm/screw. Inthis way, the nut which moves with the element/axis to be adjusted maybe disengaged, the element moved to a new position and then the nutreengaged with the drive worm/screw. So the nut and screw may actuallyemulate a linear rack and pawl for manual, non-powered adjustment.

Referring to FIG. 20 through 24, another graphical user interface isdepicted. Here, as before, the graphical icons and controls are locatedon a dynamic LCD or equivalent based display. Of note is that theelements of the seating surface may be “grabbed” by the inputtingmethods, and graphically moved, stretched, and/or deformed into a newposition or shape, thus giving additional graphical feedback relating tothe system. So the user could select an item such as a headrest with acomputer mouse, or with their finger(s) in the case of a touch screen,and change the element as desired. This could be accomplished throughthe familiar actions of clicking and dragging, in the case of a mouse,or tapping and finger sliding, in the case of a tactile input. Such atactile input may also support haptic feedback. Such feedback is usefulin giving the user a sense of their desired input, and thus a greaterlevel of control. A touch screen interface may be desirable in certainenvironments where a mouse and/or keyboard are not present or desirable.One such environment is in vehicles. The control for the supportsurfaces may be integrated into another part of the vehicle. One suchlocation would be on the dash board, or in the case of rearward seating,on the back of the seat in front of the seat to be controlled. Anotherlocation is a drop down/flip-down screen from the roof of a vehicle. Andyet another is a projected heads up display which may “float” on orbefore a surface such as a windshield. In this way the graphical userinterface may be used on the same display as that used for otherfunctions such as GPS (global positioning system) stereo/radio control,or other entertainment functions such as video players etc.

It has been found to be advantageous to limit certain motions orrestrict when certain other events are occurring. One example is thatthe control of the current invention when employed in vehicular seatingmay restrict seat position movement relative to the floor pan when thevehicle is moving, or moving at a set rate/speed so that seat to pedaldimensions are retained when the vehicle is moving. Another example ofthis anticipated mode of operation is that the seat back angle (trunk tothigh angle) may be limited when the vehicle is moving, but unlimitedwhen not. This would prevent users from driving from a “lying downposition” or semi “lying down position.” This has safety implicationsboth from a driving safety position but also such a position can defeatsafety devices such as seatbelts and airbags in the case of an accident.This system would still allow an occupant to assume that potentiallyrestful position when the vehicle is at a relatively safe speed orstopped.

As was discussed earlier, it is often ergonomically desirable to havethe position of a support surface, the shape of a support surface, orthe firmness of a support surface change in response or in concert withanother changing variable. As already discussed, this could be thechanging of the user's task, the shifting of weight and/or positionwithin the supporting surfaces, or induced by the change of the positionof one or more support surfaces relative to each other or the groundplane. One such cited example is that it has been found that lumbarand/or sacral requirements can change relative to the amount of reclineone assumes. This could be any or all of the previously mentionedshifting of weight, changing of task, shifting of weight and/or positionwithin the supporting surfaces, or change of the position of one or moresupport surfaces relative to each other or the ground plane. Whereas, ifsomeone simply shifted from side to side with a support surface/chair,this could cause a similar change (or different asymmetrical change) inthe lumbar and/or sacral requirements.

Another area of interest, and novel direction of the invention, relatesto headrests. This has been discussed earlier, but will be expanded uponhere. When one reclines, and is using a computer monitor, driving,watching television, or engaged in other similar activity, the desire isto have a headrest move forward to maintain that field of view. As amatter of fact, there have been chairs with headrests that have alinkage mechanism to accomplish this as the user reclines. Theshortcomings of this are numerous, but some of the outstanding ones arethese. In the solutions to date, the amount that the headrest movesforward is a prescribed amount dictated by the linkage used. So even ifa starting position were set, the final position is a result of thelinkage utilized, and if a final-reclined headrest position is set, viceversa. Additionally, this does not take into account all the positionsbetween a first and final position, i.e., semi-reclined. So a nonlinearratio is unattainable, and if it were, it would not be customizable.Next, this scenario assumes that a given field of view is to bemaintained, and also assumes what that field of view is to be. Contraryto this is the person who wants to recline to read. Many people like tohold a book or paper with their elbows supported on the armrest (whichmay reposition for this task) and the book or paper is elevated. In thiscase, the most comfortable position is to actually have the headreststay static or move rearward (depending on the user) as the userreclines. This is completely contrary to what the linkage solutiondictates. Also, some people actually use their eye movement moreeffectively or differently than others, reducing or increasing thefactor, impact and comfort of head position. These same relationshipsand changing relationships occur throughout the chair's supportsurfaces. These relationships include the relative position (to theother support surfaces or the ground plane) of the arm pads, theattitude of the seat to the back, the seat to the floor, the back to thefloor, leg-rests to the seat-pan, the headrest as discussed, etc. andthen all the associated relative contours of these support surfaces. Aspreviously discussed, these changes may be invoked because of or thoughthe presets, positional sensors, pressure sensors, the movement of othersupport surfaces automatically or manually, or the like. Only thisinvention addresses all of these variable situations in a variable andcustomizable way that can be invoked manually or automatically by theuser or the system.

Another anticipated input and graphical feedback is where a switchitself contains a dynamic display. In some cases this may be an LCD oralternatively an OLED type. This display can change to indicate theinput and effect that the use of the switch would impart. In this way, asingle switch may be used for a variety of changing functions. Thiscould be especially useful in certain applications such as loungers,couches or on the sides of an automotive/airline or other vehicularseat. One such company that produces this type of technology is UnitedKeys. As said this could occur on the side of the seating/supportsurface or on another surface such as a remote control like device thedashboard of a vehicle or behind a concealing panel such as under a flipup arm cushion.

Another anticipated mode of input that can be used with some or all ofthe other options outlined in this disclosure is that a cell phone, PDA,or as already mentioned a common remote control may be used as acontrolling interface. Also many of these devices are increasinglyemploying HTML or other universal interfaces which as discussed has someadvantages. With these and the other disclosed interfaces, a stylus maybe used as in input as well a voice recognition as well as hand or othergestures within the general proximity of the support surface or displayinterface to input the user's intent.

Another anticipated mode is one where a multitude of support surfacesmay be controlled and monitored from a single GUI. This could beparticularly useful in hospitals or other clinical settings. A nursecould set up a chair or other support surface using a handheld computer,and then the support surface could react in the ways already described,thus creating stimulation and increased blood flow for the occupantalready discussed. Additionally, the movements, heating, cooling,massage-vibrational and other may provide other therapeutic benefits. Asbefore the GUI may provide an inputting architecture, and then there maybe a separate microprocessor associated with the support surface forintermediate control. The surface may also transmit data back to the GUIor another central control center. This data could include bloodpressure, heart rate temperature etc.

The following discussion relates to Attachments 1, 2, and 3; Exhibits A,B, C and D; and “Excerpts from some of the Inventor's Various Notes”found in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272, asoriginally filed. These attachments, exhibits, appendices, and excerptsare incorporated here by reference.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 4 of Attachment 1 in the appendices of U.S.Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272, a pressure map of a person seatedon a support surface can be seen. These pressure mats are often placedon a seating surface so that designers may assess their work, andadditionally back correlate that information to the feedback individualsverbally give concerning seating comfort.

Of note is that different people will produce differing “pressureprofiles” when seated on the same surface. This is because, as hasalready been noted, individual body-types vary greatly in size, shape,and weight distribution, as well as the body's own padding. Using theaforementioned sensors, such a mapping could be used to alter thesurface to optimize the pressure points for an individual. A graphicalapproximation of this could be displayed on the GUI and the occupantcould see the direct effects of their changes. The term “graphicalapproximation” is used as it is anticipated that a novel andadvantageous, from a cost, reliability and simplification perspective,approach may be to interoperalate (increase resolution based onassumables) the data from a few data points, or sensors and thus createa continuous interpretation of that data for processing or viewingthrough the GUI or printouts.

Exhibit A in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272is printed out pages from an internal, confidential, nonpublicpresentation given on the inventors computer on Jun. 10, 2008 in Chicagowith a Confidentiality agreement in place.

Exhibit B in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272is printed out pages from an internal, confidential, nonpublic projectedpresentation the inventor gave on Jul. 1, 2008 in Grand Rapids/KentwoodMich. with a Confidentiality agreement in place.

Exhibit C in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272is printed out pages from an internal, confidential, nonpublic,projected presentation the inventor gave on Aug. 27, 2008 in GrandRapids/Kentwood Mich. with a Confidentiality agreement in place.

Exhibit D in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272contains actual images of the invention.

Images labeled as FIGS. 20-25 of Exhibit D in the appendices of U.S.Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272 are screen shots of an actual GUI.

Images labeled as FIGS. 26-31 in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos.61/204,045 and 12/648,272 are photos of a chair that is controlled bythe GUI interface of FIGS. 20-25 in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos.61/204,045 and 12/648,272. Its arms may individually move up and downand individually move in and out (width) relative to the rest of thesupport surfaces. The back angle may be altered as can be seen in FIG.30 in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and 12/648,272. Itsseat depth may be changed fore and aft. The angle of the headrest may bealtered with the GUI. The lumbar can also be altered with the GUI, aswell as other contour alterable actuators. These images include thereference numerals:

-   -   36. Closed loop Feedback module such as a potentiometer, encoder        etc.    -   37. Wireless receiver    -   38. Battery holder

The attachments in the appendices of U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/204,045 and12/648,272 are:

Attachment #1 “Aeron—The Art of Pressure Distribution” is a white paperfrom Herman Miller Inc. explaining an existing use of pressure mappingin chair design. Also presented is an explanation of some of thechallenges in making a chair that exhibits even and proper pressuredistribution for a wide variety of body sizes and shapes.

Attachment #2 “Cross Performance at Work” is a white paper from HermanMiller Inc., and substantiates the inventors previous outlining of theimportance of multiple postures throughout the day, users not adjustingtheir chairs throughout the day, the importance of a worker being ableto adapt to various tasks and thus not be limited by his work surfacesor chair, and also affirms the fact that a variety of workers that mayshare the same work surfaces and chairs.

Attachment #3 “If the Chair Fits” is a white paper from Herman MillerInc. It like Attachment #2 “Cross Performance at Work”, covers thevarious issues in chair design, points out that a complete solution isunrealized, and thus serves to further support the importance andsignificance of the invention at hand.

These attachments and their references serve to further demonstratevarious ergonomic challenges, needs and difficulties of making seatingsurfaces accommodate the wide range of body types of individuals and thewide range of tasks that these individuals are involved in.

Thus, a new and improved method of support surface construction andvariety of associated actuators has been provided for. One aspect isthat these improved methods provide greater comfort through the userbeing able to customize the support surface. Whether it be by alteringthe contour and/or firmness, of a support surface, or by vibrating, orheating/cooling the support surface or by altering the overall relativeposition of a support surface. Also provided is a new and novelinterfaces for controlling the actuators as well as new and novelmethods of charging a battery that may drive the actuators.

I claim:
 1. A variable body support system comprising: a. a body support surface having at least one area of adjustment, b. at least one actuator associated with the body support surface, c. a screen interface d. a computer operatively associated with the actuator and programmed to provide a graphical user interface for controlling the at least one actuator, where the graphical user interface includes a picture of the support surface, and the computer responding to an input from the user introduces new graphical elements into the graphical user interface for controlling the at least one actuator, thereby altering the at least one area of adjustment.
 2. The device of claim 1, where the input is characterized as voice recognition.
 3. The device of claim 1, where the new graphical elements are indicators highlighted on at least one area of the picture of the support surface.
 4. The device of claim 3 where the new graphical elements are arrows.
 5. The device of claim 1, where the new graphical elements are adjacent to at least one area of the picture of the support surface.
 6. The device of claim 5, where the new graphical elements are arrows.
 7. A variable body support system comprising: a. a body support surface having at least one area of adjustment, b. at least one actuator associated with the body support surface, c. a screen interface, and d. a computer operatively associated with the actuator and programmed to provide a graphical user interface for controlling the at least one actuator, where the graphical user interface includes a picture of the support surface, and the computer responding to a vocal input from a user introduces new graphical elements into the graphical user interface for controlling the at least one actuator, thereby altering the at least one area of adjustment.
 8. The device of claim 7, where the new graphical elements are indicators highlighted on at least one area of the picture of the support surface.
 9. The device of claim 8, where the new graphical elements are arrows.
 10. The device of 7, where the new graphical elements are adjacent to at least one area of the picture of the support surface.
 11. A variable body support system comprising: a. a body support surface having at least one area of adjustment, b. at least one actuator associated with the body support surface, c. a screen interface, and d. a computer operatively associated with the actuator and programmed to provide a graphical user interface for controlling the at least one actuator, where the graphical user interface includes a picture of the support surface, and the computer responding to a gesture input from a user introduces new graphical elements into the graphical user interface for controlling the at least one actuator, thereby altering the at least one area of adjustment.
 12. The device of claim 11, where the new graphical elements are indicators highlighted on at least one area of the picture of the support surface.
 13. The device of claim 12, where the new graphical elements are arrows.
 14. The device of 11, where the new graphical elements are adjacent to at least one area of the picture of the support surface. 